MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093018668 · doi:10.1353/bh.2006.0012

Soup Cans and Love Slaves: National Politics and Cultural Authority in the Editing and Authorship of Canadian Pulp Magazines

2006· article· en· W2093018668 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Denise Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueBook history · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingPoliticsPleasureMedia studiesHistoryLawSociologyArtLiteraturePolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Middle class: the one too proud to read pulp magazines for pleasure and not important enough to read them for mental relaxation. —Toronto Daily Star, 19351 Kelley had been walking along Wellington Street, past the offices of some pulp magazines, when an editor saw him going by and rushed into the street and said he needed a story immediately for one of his confession magazines. "Two hundred bucks if you can do it before noon," the editor said. "So I walked in," Kelley said, "and he sat me down at a typewriter and I said "What's the title?" and the editor said "Type this at the top: I WAS A LOVE SLAVE." Ten pages later, and in time to meet me for lunch, he had done the story and collected his money. —Scott Young on pulp writer Thomas P. Kelley2 Up until 1996, it was commonly believed that the pulp magazines that circulated in mass quantities in Canada during the first half of the twentieth century were entirely American publications. The discovery of a publisher's archive, and the collection of four-hundred-and-fifty pulp magazines that went with it, proved that Canada had its own pulp publishing industry. This industry came into being at the start of the Second World War, as a ban on the import of American pulp magazines and comic books prompted Toronto's Alec Valentine to form a publishing house that could meet the demand for pulp reading materials.3 These pulps were printed and distributed in Canada until 1949, when Valentine's firm collapsed as a result of both governmental and commercial pressures. During their decade of popularity, the Canadian pulps, like their American counterparts, were hardly a lauded [End Page 261] aspect of literary culture. As the comment from the Toronto Daily Star's Humour Column suggests, pulp magazines were a widely derided form of entertainment, the possession of which signaled social differences among readers. The cavalier attitude that the prolific Canadian pulp writer, Thomas P. Kelley, showed towards his writing further demonstrated the gap between literature that one could be proud of writing or reading and literature that was considered smut. These literary distinctions are central to understanding the nature of the Pulp Magazine Collection, which is currently housed at Library and Archives Canada in Ottawa, Ontario, and the editing and authorship that defined the magazines within the collection. The class politics that surrounded the emergence of pulp production in Canada were remarkably similar to those surrounding the development of American pulp publishing. I therefore begin this essay with a brief overview of the origins of American pulps, and then go on to compare Alec Valentine's editorial strategies to those of two Canadian middle-class slicks (Chatelaine and Maclean's). My intent is to articulate the ways in which the practices of pulp production generated the pulps' status as one of the lowliest form of literature in Canada. Next, I take up the influence that the federal ban on the import of American pulp magazines, as well as cultural politics, had on the writing of pulp fiction. Importantly, Canadian pulp magazines existed within a cultural hierarchy that proved itself to be trans-national, and the lack of difference between the production of pulp fiction in Canada and its production in the United States suggested that the two nations shared many social and cultural characteristics that prompted political anxiety in Canada on a national scale. That a Canadian publisher adopted a form of American mass culture during the Second World War, and then adapted it to a national circulation within Canada, drew out fears of the Americanization of Canadian culture. Canadian pulps were thus stigmatized as both a form of lower-class literature and a form of American mass culture. The purpose of this essay, then, is to examine the ways...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBook historySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207