MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093049113 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.35319

A co‐occurrence of osteogenesis imperfecta type VI and cystinosis

2012· article· en· W2093049113 on OpenAlexaff
Tracy Tucker, Tanya N. Nelson, Sandra Sirrs, Peter J. Roughley, Francis H. Glorieux, Pierre Moffatt, Kamilla Schlade‐Bartusiak, Lindsay Brown, Frank Rauch

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalVancouver General HospitalMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystinosisOsteogenesis imperfectaGeneticsGene duplicationPhenotypeGeneBiologyMedicinePathologyCystineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteogenesis imperfecta type VI (OI type VI) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the SERPINF1 gene that encodes pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF). Cystinosis is an autosomal recessive lysosomal transport disorder caused by mutations in the CTNS gene. Both SERPINF1 and CTNS are located on chromosome 17p13.3. We describe an individual presenting with both OI type VI and cystinosis. The patient was diagnosed with cystinosis at the age of 11 months and OI type VI on bone biopsy at the age of 8 years. He has sustained over 30 fractures during his lifetime, and at the age of 19 years entered end-stage renal disease and subsequent renal transplant. An Affymetrix 6.0 array was used to look for areas of loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 17. Sequencing of the SERPINF1 and CTNS genes was performed, followed by quantitative PCR and Western blot of PEDF to characterize the identified mutation. A 6.58 Mb region of homozygosity was identified on the Affymetrix 6.0 array, encompassing both the SERPINF1 and CTNS genes. Sequencing of the genes identified homozygosity for a known pathogenic CTNS mutation and for a novel in-frame duplication in SERPINF1. Skin fibroblasts produced a markedly reduced amount of SERPINF1 transcript and PEDF protein. This patient has the concurrent phenotype of two rare recessive diseases, cystinosis and OI type VI. We identified for the first time an in-frame duplication in SERPINF1 that is responsible for the OI type VI phenotype in this patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicBiomedical Research and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207