Meyerson Phenomenon in Children: Observation in Five Cases of Congenital Melanocytic Nevi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To describe the characteristics of five pediatric patients with the Meyerson phenomenon associated with congenital melanocytic nevi, five cases were reviewed to retrieve information relating to clinical presentation, treatment and evolution of the eczematous phenomenon and of the nevi. Three of five patients were male. Mean age at presentation of the Meyerson phenomenon was 23 months (range: 4 mos-4 yrs). Three patients presented with only one halo eczematous lesion, while two patients presented with more then one halo eczematous lesions. The halo eczematous lesions were located on the leg, arm, and trunk in four, two, and two patients, respectively. All were associated with congenital melanocytic nevi with overlying hypertrichosis. Four were treated with topical corticosteroids, and five developed some degree of hypopigmentation within the nevic lesion. In children with Meyerson phenomenon associated with congenital hairy melanocytic nevi, neither trigger to the eczematous eruption nor preferential gender or anatomical site location was identified. The Meyerson phenomenon evolved towards hypopigmentation of the congenital melanocytic nevic lesions in all patients but no other cutaneous changes were observed on follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".