Regional Esophageal Pressures with Lobar Obstruction in Dogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The right lower lobes (RLL) of intact horizontal dogs were obstructed at FRC during spontaneous breathing and artificial ventilation (IPPB). At end inspiration, pressure within the RLL became less than tracheal pressure, and pressure in the lower esophagus declined to a greater extent than in the upper esophagus. Tidal pressure swings in the obstructed RLL were larger than in the esophagus during spontaneous breathing but smaller during IPPB implying that the elastic recoil of the RLL decreased during inspiration at the mediastinal side. All these changes were intensified during RLL atelectasis and counteracted by strapping of the lower chest wall. These results indicate that: (a) around a lobe moving out of phase with the rest of the lung, a force is created tending to minimize the lobar volume differences; (b) the obstructed lobe is deformed during inflation of the rest of the lung; (c) esophageal (and hence pleural) pressure gradient is modified by this localized intrapulmonary pathology apparently due to shape interactions between chest wall and lung.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".