Facilitation of Lordosis by Injection of Substance P into the Midbrain Central Gray
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behavioral experiments tested the idea that the substance P (SP) innervation of the midbrain central gray (MCG) may be involved in the hormonal induction of sexual receptivity in female rats. SP, a SP antiserum or a reported SP antagonist were injected bilaterally into the MCG in ovariectomized, estrogen-treated females, and the lordosis response was recorded at repeated intervals. In the first experiment, three doses of SP (50,500 and 1,000 ng/cannula), a single dose of LHRH (50 ng/cannula) or vehicle were given to separate groups of females. All three doses of SP produced a rapid and long-lasting (3 h) increase in lordosis scores in moderately receptive females in tests with either manual stimulation or male rats. This facilitation was similar in latency, magnitude and duration to that produced by LHRH. In the second experiment, the basic findings of experiment 1 were replicated using blind testing. As no dose-response relation was established in experiment 1, a lower dose of SP (10 ng/cannula) was used in addition to doses of 50 and 500 ng/cannula also used in experiment 1. All three doses produced similar long-lasting increases in lordosis scores as in experiment 1. MCG injections of SP also increased lordosis scores in a second series of tests using manual stimulation alone. This demonstrates that the SP-induced facilitation does not depend on an interaction between the injections and stimuli delivered only by the male rat, eg., vaginal stimuli or ultrasonic calls. The question of the importance of endogenous SP for receptivity was examined in experiment 2 using MCG injections of a SP antiserum or the SP analogue, (D-Pro2, D-Trp7,9)-SP, which has been reported to block the excitation of locus coeruleus neurons by SP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".