Research on the Working Performance of Dowel Bar during Horizontal Installation Errors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through the pullout test on dowel bar of different surface treatment modes and position deviation, the paper draws the conclusion that the plastic spraying treatment in different surface treatment modes can maximum meet the setting requirements of dowel bar, and the angular deviation of the dowel bar is the main reason for the cracking within the 50 centimeters of both sides of cement concrete pavement joint; Through the bending fatigue test, the paper evaluates the attenuation law of joint load transfer capacity under different horizontal installation error conditions(0°, 5°, 10° and 15°), and find that with the increase of dowel bar deviation angle, the initial joint load transfer capacity presents a rapid downward trend, and the performance of whole working period become worse and worse, when the angular deviation of dowel bar in the horizontal plane is not more than 5°, juncture load transfer capacity can still remain the medium level, which will not have too much influence on the working performance of dowel bar. Finally, the paper presents the looseness of dowel bar after 800,000 times of bending fatigue, and puts forward the control measures to avoid position deviation of dowel bar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".