MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093136127 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.072

Partial Orchiectomy for Presumed Malignancy in Patients With a Solitary Testis Due to a Prior Germ Cell Tumor: A Large North American Experience

2010· article· en· W2093136127 on OpenAlexaff
Nathan Lawrentschuk, Álvaro Zúñiga, Arthur C. Grabowksi, Ricardo Rendon, Michael A.S. Jewett

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersPfizer
KeywordsMedicineOrchiectomyMalignancyGerm cellTesticular Germ Cell TumorTesticleUrologyPathologyInternal medicineTesticular cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Partial orchiectomy is becoming more accepted for indications such as a metachronous germ cell tumor due to reported oncological control, and minimal functional, physical and psychological morbidity. Most data originate from Europe. Thus, we reviewed our North American experience with such men who underwent partial orchiectomy for a presumed contralateral testicular malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified demographic, clinical, pathological and outcome data on men in our institutional database who underwent partial orchiectomy for presumed testicular malignancy from 1994 to 2009 and had a prior germ cell tumor. Patients were followed with examination, markers and imaging. RESULTS: We identified 27 men, of whom 17 (63%) had malignancy, including seminoma in 9, teratoma in 3, embryonal lesion in 1, Leydig cell tumor in 3 and carcinoma in situ in 1, and 10 (37%) had benign lesions. Frozen section was accurate, no positive margins were reported and all tumors were stage 1. Carcinoma in situ was found in 9 patients (53%). No perioperative complications were recorded. Management after partial orchiectomy was observation in 12 of 17 cases. Two patients underwent completion orchiectomy for local recurrence of carcinoma in situ only, including chemotherapy in 1. A patient with seminoma elected radiation and 1 required retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for teratoma. The remaining 5 patients with carcinoma in situ were surveilled. Of the men 31% required testosterone substitution. All patients were disease free at a median 5.7-year followup with no local recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Partial orchiectomy is an option to decrease morbidity in men with a metachronous germ cell tumor. Clearly a definite benefit of partial orchiectomy is that a significant proportion of patients with suspicious testicular lesions did not have malignancy and were definitively treated with an organ sparing approach. However, partial orchiectomy is potentially associated with the need for adjuvant treatment and androgen substitution, which should be discussed with all patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207