MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093155420 · doi:10.1039/b911988d

Covalently modified graphitic carbon-based stationary phases for anion chromatography

2009· article· en· W2093155420 on OpenAlexafffund
Stuart D. Chambers, Mark T. McDermott, Charles A. Lucy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCovalent bondIonChemistryIon chromatographyCarbon fibersChromatographyStationary phaseOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon-clad zirconia particles have been converted into ion-exchange media by in situ diazonium generation and thermal deposition. The surfaces prepared possess either a permanently charged anion-exchange site or a weak anion-exchange site. Surface modification optimization experiments were performed both on planar carbon surfaces and on non-porous 2 microm and porous 3 microm carbon-based particles. Modification by traditional electrochemical and thermal deposition were compared. Surface modification with the tertiary amine functionality, N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine, yielded a capacity of 6.5 microequiv./column, stable retention for >33,000 column volumes and retention reproducibility of <2% RSD. A quaternary amine functionality (strong base exchanger) was achieved by reaction of the tertiary amine phase with methyl iodide. Utilizing short columns (35 x 4 mm i.d.) mixtures of common inorganic anions were separated with efficiencies of 21,000 plates/m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207