MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093164858 · doi:10.1061/41127(382)426

Highway Maintenance and Pavement Preservation Strategies in Canada

2010· article· en· W2093164858 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ningyuan Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPavement managementConstructabilityTransport engineeringDriver rehabilitationChristian ministryPavement engineeringInvestment (military)Asphalt pavementProcess (computing)Plan (archaeology)EngineeringHighway engineeringCivil engineeringComputer scienceRehabilitationAsphaltSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) has been one of the pioneering agencies that use Pavement Management System (PMS) analysis tools in the implementation of annual pavement maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) programming and investment planning at the network level. Currently, the MTO is in the process of upgrading its PMS by integrating pavement preservation (PP) strategies into the long-term pavement rehabilitation program. In this program, a practical PP model being developed through a set of decision trees that ensure the most cost-effective preservation treatments are selected for each pavement section. A number of factors and engineering standards are considered in the process of selecting individual PP strategies, including road functional class, traffic volume, pavement type and age, road condition, and constructability. The preservation program is developed through budget optimization process that determines the most cost-effective PP strategy for every pavement segments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207