MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093212686 · doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0009

<b>A dictionary of Plautdietsch rhyming words</b> . By Eldo Neufeld. (LINCOM studies in Germanic linguistics 15.) Munich: LINCOM Europa, 2002. Pp. vi, 67. ISBN 3895863629. $26.

2005· article· en· W2093212686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Steffen Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhymeGermanSpellingPronunciationLinguisticsPoetryVariety (cybernetics)HistoryComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A dictionary of Plautdietsch rhyming words by Eldo Neufeld Karen Steffen Chung A dictionary of Plautdietsch rhyming words. By Eldo Neufeld. (Lincom studies in Germanic linguistics 15.) Munich: Lincom Europa, 2002. Pp. vi, 67. ISBN 3895863629. $26. This book, the third in a series by the same author, will not tell you that Plautdietsch is a variety of Low German—also called ‘Mennonite German’—which is largely unintelligible to speakers of other Low German dialects, or that it is spoken by approximately 400,000 people living mainly in Canada and Latin America. It does not include a systematic pronunciation key, nor even English glosses for any of its entries. And it does not tell you that Homer Groening, father of Matt Groening of The Simpsons fame, was a Plautdietsch speaker! Fortunately there is a good deal of information on Plautdietsch on the internet (e.g. in SIL’s Ethnologue and under Wikipedia). A serviceable online Plautdietsch dictionary is available at http://www.mennolink.org/doc/lg/index.html, though many of the words in Neufeld’s rhyme lists cannot be found in this dictionary, even if you are able to derive base forms from inflected ones. What this book does offer is perhaps best described as high quality and rigorously organized fieldwork data on a little-known language, apparently intended [End Page 284] nevertheless for native speakers wishing to write Plautdietsch-language poetry. In his five-page preface and introduction, N addresses the phenomenon of near rhyme, some of the quirks of Plautdietsch spelling, and Plautdietsch patterns of inflection. Following this are 67 pages of rhymes arranged in three columns per page. Each rhyme-category word may have as few as just one rhyming word under it (e.g. only Mangel ‘dearth’ is listed under Angel ‘fishing rod’), or it may have several dozen words (as under Ekd/Ekt, which has48 items). Some rhyme-category headers seem to be actual words, others not. The rhymes are classified into three types. Section 1 is ‘Monosyllables, and words accented on the last syllable’ (masculine rhyme), for example, under Ool are hool ‘hold’, Spool ‘spool’, Stool ‘chair’, and wool ‘well being’. Section 2 is ‘Words accented on the syllable before the last’ (penultimate; feminine rhyme), for example, under Eppeld you will find dreppeld ‘pedaled’, kjneppeld ‘clubbed’, and schneppeld (not found). Section 3, ‘Words accented on the third syllable from the end’ (antepenultimate; triple rhyme), includes numerous Gilbert & Sullivan-type mosaic rhymes and near-rhymes, for example, under OM’pe-äl are Klompe Mäl ‘a pile of flour’ and Pompestä ‘pump handle’. One thing that really shines through in this little volume is the joy N takes in his unique language. He says that since his childhood in a Plautdietsch speaking community in Inman, Kansas in the 1930s and 40s, he has played with the sounds, meanings, and prosodic possibilities of Plautdietsch, in addition to writing Plautdietsch verse. An expression of this passionate involvement is found on p. v: ‘There are many Plautdietsch words of three or more syllables in common everyday usage, which simply had to be left out, because no reasonable rhymes, either single words or phrases, could be found for them, much to this writer’s chagrin!’ For the general reader who knows some German, this book is largely a folk-cultural novelty; for Low German dialect specialists, it is undoubtedly a treasure-trove of rare and valuable data. Karen Steffen Chung National Taiwan University Copyright © 2005 Linguistic Society of America

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1280.117

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguageSame topicLexicography and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207