MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093254925 · doi:10.1386/rajo.2.2.89/1

British or American?: Canada's ‘mixed’ broadcasting system in the 1930s

2004· article· en· W2093254925 on OpenAlex
Mary Vipond

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Journal International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Journalism, and Communication History
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadcasting (networking)CommissionPublic broadcastingTelecommunicationsCommercial broadcastingPeriod (music)Radio broadcastingPolitical sciencePublic administrationComputer scienceComputer securityLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the role of independent commercial radio stations in Canada in the early 1930s. Canada's first public broadcaster, the Canadian Radio Broadcasting Commission, was created in 1932. It constructed a national network comprised of its own stations and time leased on many of the previously existing privately owned stations. A number of commercial stations, however, remained independent of all networks. It is argued here that for a brief period these stations were able to provide an alternative model of locally oriented community programming that could be characterized as truly popular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it