MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093272103 · doi:10.4021/jnr.v1i5.71

Serum Uric Acid Levels in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Study of 100 Patients

2011· article· en· W2093272103 on OpenAlex
Tushar Patil, Amit Pasari, Kiran M. Sargar, Vinayak E. Shegokar, Yogendra V. Bansod, Mangesh Patil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUric acidDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineOverweightStroke (engine)GastroenterologyObesityEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: It is unclear whether Serum Uric Acid (SUA) promotes or protects against the cerebrovascular disease. Present study was done to estimate uric acid levels in patients of acute ischemic stroke. Methods: 100 cases of acute ischemic stroke were studied along with 100 controls. Risk factors for stroke were noted such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, smoking, and obesity. Serum uric acid levels were measured in cases and controls. Modified National Institute of Health (NIH) stroke scale score was calculated at admission and before discharge. Statistical analysis was performed with of SPSS 13.0 software. Results: Out of 100 patients, 63 were males and 37 were females. Mean SUA level in cases was 6.48 ± 1.92 mg / dl whereas it was 5.09 ± 1.07 mg / dl for controls. SUA values were higher among males than females, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.085). The mean SUA in hypertensive subjects (6.42 ± 1.85 mg / dl) was higher than that in normotensive subjects (5.49 ± 1.55 mg / dl). There was a statistically significant difference between SUA levels in diabetic (6.85 ± 1.86 mg / dl, Range 3.1 - 12 mg / dl) and non-diabetic patients (5.56 ± 1.58 mg / dl, Range 2.1 - 11 mg / dl)) (P = 0.00). Mean SUA in overweight patients was 6.48 ± 1.65 mg / dl (Range 2.1 - 9.9 mg / dl) whereas it was 5.55 ± 1.65 (Range 2.1 - 12 mg / dl) in patients who had a normal weight. The mean SUA in patients with metabolic syndrome was 6.82 ± 1.62 mg / dl (Range 2.1 - 10 mg / dl) and 5.45 ± 1.59 mg / dl (Range 2.1 - 12 mg / dl) for the subjects without metabolic syndrome. SUA levels were significantly higher among smokers compared to non smokers (6.36 ± 1.78 vs. 5.69 ± 1.67, P = 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between SUA and NIH stroke scale score (P less than  0.05). SUA levels were significantly higher in the patients who succumbed as compared to those who were discharged from the hospital (P = 0.00). Conclusions: SUA can be used as a marker for increased risk of stroke. Furthermore, SUA can also be used for risk stratification after stroke.  doi:10.4021/jnr71w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it