MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Architecture-Level Requirements Specification.

2003· article· en· W20933059 on OpenAlexaff
Davor Svetinović

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroscience Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsComputer scienceBusiness requirementsRequirements traceabilityTraceabilitySoftware engineeringNon-functional requirementSoftware requirements specificationSoftware architectureReference architectureRequirements engineeringArchitectureRequirementSystems engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Business processSoftwareSoftware designEngineeringSoftware developmentSoftware constructionProgramming languageOperations managementWork in processBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large gap in the levels at which requirements are specified results in inadequate means for ensuring that business goals are properly supported. Architecture-level requirements specifications help us reduce this problem by providing necessary constructs and traceability mechanisms. Enhancing traditional requirements engineering approaches by incorporating architecture-level requirement specifications will facilitate business goals satisfaction and simplify the design of appropriate software architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroscience LettersSame topicAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207