Inter‐Mount Social Interactions During Heterosexual and Homosexual Consortships in Japanese Macaques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, we examined whether female Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) exhibited male‐typical patterns of inter‐mountsocialbehaviour during homosexual consortships. Data were collected on heterosexual and homosexual consortships from a population of free‐ranging Japanese macaques in Arashiyama, Japan. Inter‐mount intervals were defined as the period between two consecutive mounts. A total of 3374 heterosexual inter‐mount intervals and 1412 homosexual inter‐mount intervals were analysed. We examined nine different categories of inter‐mount behaviour. Sex differences between heterosexually consorting males and females existed for three of the inter‐mount behaviours we examined (i.e. ventral‐to‐dorsal orientation, aggression directed toward third party individuals, tree‐shaking displays). The subordinate female partners in homosexually consorting pairs exhibited some sex‐atypical inter‐mount behaviours. This sex‐atypicality did not appear to reflect generalized developmental canalization in the direction of a male‐typical suite of behaviours. Rather, the observed behavioural sex‐atypicality could be best explained in terms of the unique alliance‐related dynamics that characterized homosexual consortships in Japanese macaques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".