MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093342197 · doi:10.1521/jaap.2005.33.4.611

The Dog's Role in the Analyst's Consulting Room

2005· article· en· W2093342197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Myron L. Glucksman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllianceCountertransferenceInterpretation (philosophy)PsychologyResistance (ecology)Object (grammar)Set (abstract data type)Process (computing)PsychotherapistSocial psychologyComputer scienceLawPolitical scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joe, a Labrador retriever, has accompanied an analyst in the consulting room since the dog was age three. Patients uniformly find him soothing and reassuring. In this capacity, he facilitates the therapeutic alliance and the holding environment. In addition, he often functions as a transitional object and transference displacement. Patients frequently use him as an introject for certain qualities they desire, such as security, strength, and confidence. Sometimes he promotes enactments between the patient and the analyst. At other times, he functions as a countertransference displacement for the analyst. On occasion, he is incorporated into the patient's defensive maneuvers and resistance. In each of these roles, he facilitates key elements of the therapeutic process, including exploration, understanding, interpretation, and working-through. Perhaps his most important role is that of a nonjudgmental, supportive, loyal cotherapist. Case illustrations highlight Joe's various functions in the analyst's consulting room.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic PsychiatrySame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207