MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093385777 · doi:10.1109/icon.2012.6506565

Performance analysis of an optimal internal congestion control in a cluster-based router

2012· article· en· W2093385777 on OpenAlexafffund
Qinghua Ye, Seyed Hossein Mortazavi, M.H. MacGregor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRouterComputer scienceScalabilityInfiniBandThroughputNetwork congestionFlow control (data)Computer networkNetwork packetOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we report a simulation study of the scalability and performance of an optimal utility-based congestion control for a cluster-based router composed of commodity processors connected by a high-speed InfiniBand network. This control is optimal in the sense that it maximizes the sum of the utilities over ingress rates subject to an egress capacity constraint. We validate our simulation results by comparing them to experimental results from a small-scale prototype, and to the results from a fluid-flow model. One of the key aspects tested is the behaviour of the router's internal congestion control as a function of router size and varying traffic patterns. Our results show that the optimal scheme provides much smoother and tighter control than an AIMD-based control, thus leading to significantly higher throughput and lower delays. Our results also show that the optimal control scales well to large numbers of interfaces, and reacts quickly to changes in the input traffic intensity and pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207