MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093405367 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2007.905536

Modeling and Design of Multilevel Bang–Bang CDRs in the Presence of ISI and Noise

2007· article· en· W2093405367 on OpenAlexaff
F. A. S. Musa, Anthony Chan Carusone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJitterIntersymbol interferenceNoise (video)White noiseComputer scienceMarkov chainPhase noiseDetectorControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmElectronic engineeringStatisticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multilevel clock-and-data recovery (CDR) systems are analyzed, modeled, and designed. A stochastic analysis provides probability density functions that are used to estimate the effect of intersymbol interference (ISI) and additive white noise on the characteristics of the phase detector (PD) in the CDR. A slope detector based novel multilevel bang-bang CDR architecture is proposed and modeled using the stochastic analysis and its performance compared with a typical multilevel Alexander PD-based CDR for equal-loop bandwidths. The rms jitter of the CDRs are predicted using a linear jitter model and a Markov chain and verified using behavioral simulations. Jitter tolerance simulations are also employed to compare the two CDRs. Both analytical calculations and behavioral simulations predict that at equal-loop bandwidths, the proposed architecture is superior to the Alexander type CDR at large ISI and low signal-to-noise ratios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and ApplicationsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207