MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093422372 · doi:10.1177/0037768611412136

Téléprédication et port du voile en Tunisie

2011· article· en· W2093422372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Compass · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHajjReligiosityIslamEthosSociologyReligious studiesIdeal (ethics)SufismPolitical scienceLawTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The newly widespread and highly popular presence of Islamic TV-preaching on Arab satellite channels has accompanied the re-composition of religious practice in the Arab and Muslim world, becoming the primary means of religious transmission. The authors define and illustrate the re-composition in terms of personal ethics and identity affirmation, which are implied by this new mode of marketing strategy in a Tunisian society already shaped by the global market economy and its consumer ethos. On the basis of an empirical study consisting of participant observation and interviews with 48 veiled Tunisian women, the authors propose two religious ideal-types, corresponding to two different interpretations of mega-star TV-preacher Amr Khaled’s preachings and two different types of religiosity, which are the express of different ways of legitimizing the wearing of the Muslim veil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it