Influence of the Preparation Method and Metal Precursor Compound on Alumina-Supported Pd Catalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supported palladium catalysts were prepared by two different methods: wet impregnation and incipient-wetness impregnation. Commercial gamma-Al2O3 and sol-gel derived alumina were used as support. The synthesis of alumina xerogel was carried out by hydrolysis of aluminum isopropoxide (AIP) in 2-propanol solution. Organometallic -Pd(C5H7O2)2- and inorganic precursor -Pd(NH3)4Cl2.H2O- were used for the synthesis of the catalytic systems.Samples were characterized by BET surface area measurement, atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), and hydrogen chemisorption. The activity of these catalysts was studied for the stoichiometric reduction of NO by methane. The decomposition of NO and methane oxidation were also used as a test reaction. Catalyst prepared by wet impregnation method using Pd(C5H7O2)2 and alumina xerogel presented the best performance for the studied reaction. The activity of Pd/alumina catalysts for NO-CH4 reaction is related to the facility for reduction/oxidation of the metal. This property is affected by the nature of the support as well as the metal precursor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".