MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093426099 · doi:10.1021/ma021175r

Stimuli-Responsive Aqueous Micelles from an ABC Metallo-Supramolecular Triblock Copolymer

2002· article· en· W2093426099 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐François Gohy, Bas G. G. Lohmeijer, Sunil K. Varshney, B. Décamps, Éric Leroy, Sylvie Boileau, Ulrich S. Schubert

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsPolymer Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicelleCopolymerSupramolecular chemistryDynamic light scatteringPolymer chemistryAqueous solutionEthylene oxideMaterials scienceStyreneRutheniumChemistryCrystallographyNanotechnologyCrystal structureNanoparticleOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A metallo-supramolecular ABC triblock copolymer containing a bis(2,2‘:6‘,2‘ ‘-terpyridine)ruthenium(II) complex as a supramolecular connection between the constituting poly(styrene)- block -poly(2-vinylpyridine) diblock and poly(ethylene oxide) block (PS 32 - b -P2VP 13 -[Ru]-PEO 70 ) has been prepared. This copolymer was further utilized in order to prepare aqueous micelles consisting of a PS core, a pH-sensitive P2VP shell, and a PEO corona. The accordingly formed micelles have been characterized by a combination of dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Spherical micelles and a minor fraction of bigger aggregates were observed by these three independent techniques. The pH sensitivity of the P2VP shell could be demonstrated and the reversibility of the metallo-supramolecular complex investigated utilizing a strong competitive ligand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations147
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207