Bit‐error‐rate performance improvement of mobile dual‐hop relaying systems using directional antennas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The bit‐error‐rate (BER) performance of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems in mobile multi‐hop relaying (MMR) system is severely degraded by the effect of Doppler shift and the severity of this degradation increases with the number of hops traversed by the OFDM signal. In this study, the authors propose a method to mitigate the effect of Doppler shift in MMR system (such as the IEEE 802.16j system) using directional antennas. It is shown that the effect of the resulting inter‐carrier interference (ICI) because of the phase noise generated by the Doppler shift over multi‐hop relaying channels, can be reduced by employing directional antennas at both the mobile and relay stations. Consequently, the BER performance of MMR system is significantly enhanced. Analysis and simulation results show that the BER enhancements using the proposed approach are strongly related to the orientation and beamwidth of the directional antenna employed. As the antenna beamwidth is reduced, the BER enhancement increases for both the perpendicular and parallel antenna orientations, and comparing these two orientations, the parallel orientation case provides slightly better BER enhancements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".