MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093522550 · doi:10.1051/medsci/2008242157

Coup d’œil sur les petites GTPases Rho

2008· review· fr· W2093522550 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2008
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesRHOAMolecular biologyGTPasePhysicsBiologyPhilosophyCell biologySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42, the founding members of the Rho subfamily of small GTPases, have been the focus of many research studies since the first discovery of their primary roles in the reorganisation of the actin cytoskeleton. Since then, it is clear that they are involved in a great deal of cellular functions, including cell migration and adhesion, cell growth control, and membrane trafficking. The complete sequencing of the human genome has now highlighted a total of 20 genes encoding Rho-like proteins. Little is known about their distinct cellular functions, however, numerous studies are now beginning to unravel that each of the Rho GTPase must play a specific role in the cell in a timely and spatially regulated fashion. Here, we are presenting a brief overview of the distinct functional roles and similarities known to date for each of the Rho members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it