Leaf absorption, withdrawal and remobilization of autumn-applied urea-N in apple
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Six-year-old well-nourished Jonagold/M9 apple (Malus domestica) trees were sprayed 7 d after harvest with a 2% urea solution enriched with 9.9% atom 15N. Through 3 d of the absorption period, leaves absorbed 19.2% of the intercepted urea 15N. This low absorption could be in part due to unfavourable conditions, i.e., low temperatures (daily mean ≈5°C) and windy conditions following treatment. During leaf senescence, 48% of the urea 15N absorbed was withdrawn from leaves and most of that (95%) remained in the treated branch section. Of this portion, 65% of the urea 15N was found in dormant bark, 29% in wood, and 6% in flower buds. In the following spring, 46% of the stored urea 15N was remobilized for growth of the flower buds when sampled at the “pink” stage of bud development. This accounted for 3.8% of total N in these tissues. This contribution did not influence flower quality, estimated by the length of the period between flower opening and petal fall and the level of fruit set. Key words: Malus × domestica, urea-15N, flower bud growth, fruit set
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".