MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2093597634 · doi:10.1121/1.4781454

Bayesian inversion of propagation and reverberation data

2006· article· en· W2093597634 on OpenAlexaff
Peter L. Nielsen, Stan E. Dosso

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverberationAcousticsGibbs samplingGeologyScatteringInversion (geology)A priori and a posterioriBayesian probabilityMaximum a posteriori estimationUnderwater acousticsComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsUnderwaterPhysicsSeismologyOpticsMaximum likelihoodArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Bayesian matched-field inversion approach to infer geoacoustic and scattering properties of the seabed is applied to simulated propagation and reverberation data received on a towed horizontal array. The approach is based on the method of fast Gibbs sampling (FGS) of the posterior probability density to estimate uncertainties in both geoacoustic and scattering parameters for broadband acoustic data in realistic shallow-water environments. The FGS is linked to an acoustic propagation model that simultaneously provides complex acoustic pressure at short propagation ranges and long-range reverberation intensity. The inversion algorithm is initially applied to long-range reverberation data alone to assess the geoacoustic information content of reverberation in terms of marginal posteriori probability densities for the environmental parameters. A reduction in uncertainty for the extracted geoacoustic and scattering parameters is demonstrated by a simultaneous inversion of the propagation and reverberation horizontal array data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicUnderwater Acoustics Research→French-language works237,207→