MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093625211 · doi:10.1021/jp013970x

Direct Visualization of the Hydrolysis Kinetics of Titanium(IV) Alkoxides on Functionalized Gold Surfaces

2002· article· en· W2093625211 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversitySimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTitaniumHydrolysisReaction rate constantAqueous solutionContact angleChemistryKineticsReaction rateMonolayerInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringPhysical chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceOrganic chemistryComposite materialCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydrolysis kinetics of titanium(IV) alkoxides coordinated on functionalized gold surfaces was monitored with video-based contact angle measurements, and the experimental data were further modeled to evaluate pseudo-first-order reaction rate constants. In particular, titanium(IV) isopropoxide molecules were attached to dithiothreitol monolayers on gold from dilute 2-propanol solution to form titanium-coordinated surfaces. The side view of a sessile drop of aqueous solution on the titanium-coordinated surface changed significantly as a function of time (corresponding to an apparent decrease in the contact angles), indicating that the surface became more hydrophilic as a result of its reaction with aqueous solution (i.e., the hydrolysis and polycondensation). The kinetics of this surface reaction was modeled, for the first time, based on the observed changes in the time-dependent contact angles. Pseudo-first-order kinetic parameters obtained showed an interesting two-step reaction feature when water was used ( k 1 = 0.91 × 10 -3 s -1 and k 2 = 2.1 × 10 -3 s -1 ), while the experiments using acid and base solutions displayed a clear enhancement effect and were better modeled with only one rate constant ( k overall = 2.3 × 10 -3 s -1 for 0.10 M HCl and k overall = 5.0 × 10 -3 s -1 for 0.10 M NaOH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it