MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093651302 · doi:10.1002/mrm.20453

Accelerating MRI by skipped phase encoding and edge deghosting (SPEED)

2005· article· en· W2093651302 on OpenAlexaff
Qing‐San Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAliasingFilter (signal processing)Encoding (memory)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer sciencePhase (matter)AlgorithmArtifact (error)SIGNAL (programming language)Noise (video)AccelerationMinificationk-spaceArtificial intelligenceFourier transformComputer visionMathematicsPhysicsImage (mathematics)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fast imaging method called skipped phase encoding and edge deghosting (SPEED) is introduced. The k-space is sparsely sampled into three interleaved datasets, each with a skip-size N and a relative shift in phase encoding (PE). These datasets are separately reconstructed by 2DFT and edge-enhanced by a differential filter in the PE direction, resulting in edge maps with phase-shifted aliasing ghosts. The sparseness of edges reduces the chance of ghost overlapping. Typical ghosted-edge maps can be adequately modeled with only two dominating ghost layers that are resolved from a set of three equations using least-square error minimization, yielding N ghost maps of different orders that can be registered and averaged into a single deghosted-edge map for noise and artifact reduction. Finally, the deghosted-edge map is transformed into a deghosted image by an inverse filter. A few central k-space lines are collected without PE skip to aid the inverse filtering. SPEED has been demonstrated by in vivo data to reduce scan time considerably without noticeable artifacts. It has various potential applications, such as MR angiography (MRA), where the signal itself is sparse. As an independent method, SPEED can be combined with other fast imaging methods for further acceleration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207