MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093673854 · doi:10.1089/jpm.2007.0009

Maximum Conservative Management: A Worthwhile Treatment for Elderly Patients with Renal Failure Who Choose Not to Undergo Dialysis

2007· article· en· W2093673854 on OpenAlexaff
Áine Burns, Rachel C. Carson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Palliative Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsVancouver Island UniversityVancouver General HospitalVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePalliative careDialysisPresentation (obstetrics)Intensive care medicineKidney diseaseConservative managementDiseaseNursingInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper has been compiled from a presentation given by the first author to the "Palliative and End of Life Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Evidence" meeting held in London in October 2006. It summarizes some of what is known about the topic as well as the authors' research and experience in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Palliative MedicineSame topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207