MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093684504 · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.100.3.577

STRUCTURAL CONTROLS ON THE ARCHEAN TROILUS GOLD-COPPER DEPOSIT, QUEBEC, CANADA

2005· article· en· W2093684504 on OpenAlexafffundabout
S. Goodman, Anthony E. Williams‐Jones, P. Carles

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArcheanCopperGeologyGeochemistryMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Troilus gold-copper deposit is a low-grade, high-tonnage resource, hosted in Archean calc-alkaline intrusive rocks, in the Superior province of Quebec. It is best known for being one of the few Archean analogues of a porphyry Cu-Au deposit, an interpretation with significant implications for both mineral exploration and theories of Archean plate tectonics. Recent research presented here has called into question the prevalent genetic model and proposes instead a two-stage history of mineralization controlled by contrasting structural regimes developed as part of an orogen. Disseminated gold-copper mineralization and associated potassic alteration occur in a deformation corridor between two felsic dikes, emplaced prior to the peak of regional metamorphism. Postpeak metamorphic, high strain sericitic zones with silicified envelopes host quartz veins and a second phase of gold. The present size, grade, and disposition of the orebody is the result of the superposition of these two events, an interpretation that impacts on the genetic model as well as exploration, exploitation, and grade control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207