MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093702583 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.014524

Muon spin relaxation studies of incommensurate magnetism and superconductivity in stage-4<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CuO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CuO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2002· article· lv· W2093702583 on OpenAlexaff
A. T. Savici, Y. Fudamoto, I. M. Gat, T. Ito, M. Larkin, Y. J. Uemura, G. M. Luke, Kenji Kojima, Y. S. Lee, M. A. Kastner, R. J. Birgeneau, Kenneth M. Yamada

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuon spin spectroscopyMuonRelaxation (psychology)MagnetismPhysicsSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsParticle physicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report muon spin relaxation $(\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR})$ measurements using single crystals of oxygen-intercalated stage-4 ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4.11}$ (LCO:4.11) and ${\mathrm{La}}_{1.88}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.12}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ (LSCO:0.12), in which neutron scattering studies have found incommensurate magnetic Bragg reflections. In both systems, zero-field $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ measurements show muon spin precession below the N\'eel temperature ${T}_{N}$ with frequency 3.6 MHz at $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{T}0,$ having a Bessel function line shape, characteristic of spin-density-wave systems. The amplitude of the oscillating and relaxing signals of these systems is less than half the value expected for systems with static magnetic order in 100% of the volume. Our results are consistent with a simulation of local fields for a heuristic model with (a) incommensurate spin amplitude modulation with the maximum ordered Cu moment size of $\ensuremath{\sim}0.36{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B},$ (b) static Cu moments on the ${\mathrm{CuO}}_{2}$ planes forming ``islands'' having typical radius $15--30 \mathrm{\AA{}},$ comparable to the in-plane superconducting coherence length, and (c) the measured volume fraction of magnetic muon sites ${V}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ increasing progressively with decreasing temperature below ${T}_{N}$ towards ${V}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremath{\sim}40%$ for LCO:4.11 and 18% for LSCO:0.12 at $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{T}0.$ These results may be compared with correlation lengths in excess of $600 \mathrm{\AA{}}$ and a long range ordered moment of $0.15\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ measured with neutron scattering techniques. In this paper we discuss a model that reconciles these apparently contradictory results. In transverse magnetic field $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ measurements, sensitive to the in-plane magnetic field penetration depth ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{ab}},$ the results for LCO:4.11 and LSCO:0.12 follow correlations found for underdoped, overdoped and Zn-doped high-${T}_{c}$ cuprate systems in a plot of ${T}_{c}$ versus the superconducting relaxation rate $\ensuremath{\sigma}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{T}0).$ This indicates that the volume-integrated value of ${n}_{s}{/m}^{*}$ (superconducting carrier density / effective mass) is a determining factor for ${T}_{c},$ not only in high-${T}_{c}$ cuprate systems without static magnetism, but also in the present systems where superconductivity coexists with static spin-density-wave spin order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207