MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093714952 · doi:10.1002/lsm.10000

Vascular procedures that thermo‐coagulate collagen reduce local platelet deposition and thrombus formation: Laser and laser‐thermal versus balloon angioplasty

2001· article· en· W2093714952 on OpenAlexaff
George S. Abela, Elie Hage-Korban, Takanobu Tomaru, Gérald Barbeau, Oliver G. Abela, Stephan E. Friedl

Bibliographic record

VenueLasers in Surgery and Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsThrombogenicityPlateletThrombusAngioplastyBiomedical engineeringMedicineBalloonCoagulationThrombosisLumen (anatomy)SurgeryMaterials sciencePathologyCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Exposure of the arterial wall matrix to blood leads to platelet deposition resulting in thrombosis. Because heat alters tissue matrix we proposed that heating reduces platelet deposition. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty arterial homografts (15 dogs) were mounted in an arterio-venous "shunt." Interventions included balloon angioplasty (BA), direct laser (LA), laser-thermal (LTA), and combined LTABA. 111Indium-labeled platelets were circulated, radio activity measured, and homografts processed for histology. RESULTS: Radioactivity count (mean+/- SE) at BA sites (13,853+/-3,192 cpm/cm(2)) was greater than LA (7,038+/-981), LTA (5,294 +/-1,145), LTABA (6,176+/-1,571), and control (1,826+/-339), P<0.05. Electron microscopy showed fewer platelets at LA, LTA, and control than BA sites. BA spread the collagen on the arterial lumen while heat gelled collagen and confined it to the arterial media. CONCLUSIONS: Heating the artery and gelling collagen during LA, LTA, or LTABA significantly reduced thrombogenicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLasers in Surgery and MedicineSame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207