MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093716918 · doi:10.1063/1.3436594

Persistence of In/Ga intermixing beyond the emission energy blueshift saturation of proton-implanted InAs/GaAs quantum dots

2010· article· en· W2093716918 on OpenAlexaff
Z. Zaâboub, Bouraoui Ilahi, B. Salem, Vincent Aimez, David L. Morris, L. Sfaxi, H. Mâaref

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlueshiftPhotoluminescenceAnnealing (glass)IonQuantum dotSaturation (graph theory)Ion implantationMaterials scienceProtonCoalescence (physics)OptoelectronicsAtomic physicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low temperature photoluminescence (PL) measurements are carried out to investigate the influence of the high extent of intermixing induced by proton implantation and subsequent annealing on the optical and electronic properties of the InAs/GaAs quantum dots (QDs). Several QDs structures were proton implanted at various doses (5×1011–1×1015 ions cm−2) with an acceleration energy of 18 keV and then annealed at 700 °C for 30 s. A saturation of the emission energy blueshift is found to occur for implantation doses higher than 5×1013 ions cm−2 accompanied with a continual decrease in the intersublevel spacing energy suggesting that the intermixing process persists beyond the emission energy blueshift saturation. An additional emission peak was found to appear in PL spectra for proton doses higher than 1×1014 ions cm−2 and attributed to the coalescence of closely spaced QDs. Strain assisted predominant lateral intermixing is proposed as the main factor responsible for the observed behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207