MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Response of red‐osier dogwood (<i>Cornus stolonifera</i>) seedlings to sodium sulphate salinity: effects of supplemental calcium

2005· article· en· W2093720710 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvie Renault

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiologia Plantarum · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to water stress
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShootCalciumSodiumPotassiumChemistrySugarHemicelluloseCell wallBotanyHorticultureSalinitySeedlingCelluloseBiologyFood scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A greenhouse study was designed to test the effects of sodium sulphate (Na 2 SO 4 ) on red‐osier dogwood ( Cornus stolonifera Michx) seedlings in the presence and absence of additional calcium (Ca 2+ ). Changes in growth parameters, ion and carbohydrate accumulation and cell wall composition were examined. Calcium alleviated the effect of Na 2 SO 4 on shoot height; however, it did not affect the reduction in shoot and root dry weights. An increased level of sodium (Na + ) in roots of plant exposed to Na 2 SO 4 was recorded in the presence of supplemental Ca 2+ whereas there was no change in potassium (K + ) and Ca 2+ levels. In shoots of seedlings treated with Na 2 SO 4 , the addition of Ca 2+ did not affect Na + , K + and Ca 2+ levels. The amount of soluble carbohydrates was increased in leaves of seedlings treated with Na 2 SO 4 both in the absence and presence of supplemental Ca 2+ . The decrease in cell wall material in response to salt stress was alleviated by Ca 2+ in stem tissues although Ca 2+ did not alter the changes in hemicellulose and cellulose. Sugar composition of pectins and hemicellulose were modified in stems and leaves by Na 2 SO 4 and/or Ca 2+ . The results of this study showed that calcium was able to alleviate the effects of salt stress on shoot height and cell wall content of red‐osier dogwood stems. Furthermore, changes occurred in cell wall composition of red osier seedlings treated with Na 2 SO 4 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologia PlantarumSame topicPlant responses to water stressFrench-language works237,207