MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093728904 · doi:10.1177/0883073813514134

Global Developmental Delay, Progressive Relapsing-Remitting Parkinsonism, and Spinal Syrinx in a Child With <i>SOX6</i> Mutation

2014· article· en· W2093728904 on OpenAlexaff
Ori Scott, Jeffrey A. Pugh, Darcie Kiddoo, Lyn K. Sonnenberg, Steven Bamforth, Helly Goez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Child Neurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalGlenrose Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinal cordDysarthriaNeuroscienceParkinsonismSyrinx (medicine)MedicinePsychologyGene mutationMutationBiologyPathologyDiseaseGeneAudiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SOX6, a member of the SOX gene family, plays a key role in the development of several mammalian tissues and organs, including the central nervous system. Specifically, this gene modulates the differentiation and proliferation of interneurons in the medial ganglionic eminence, as well as oligodendrocytes in the spinal cord. We describe the case of a 4-year-old girl with global developmental delay and a spinal cord syrinx who presented with recurrent episodes of parkinsonian symptoms subsequent to febrile illnesses. The symptoms included gait instability, tremor, and dysarthria, with a progressive relapsing-remitting course over the span of 2 years. The patient was later found to have a large deletion-type mutation in the SOX6 gene. This case is the first report in humans implying a role for SOX6 in basal ganglia function, as well as spinal cord development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Child NeurologySame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207