EEG spectro-temporal modulation energy: A new feature for automated diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is recent indication that Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be characterized by atypical modulation of electrophysiological brain activity caused by fibrillar amyloid deposition in specific regions of the brain, such as those related to cognition and memory. In this paper, we propose to objectively characterize EEG sub-band modulation in an attempt to develop an automated noninvasive AD diagnostics tool. First, multi-channel full-band EEG signals are decomposed into five well-known frequency sub-bands: delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma. The temporal amplitude envelope of each sub-band is then computed via a Hilbert transformation. The proposed 'spectro-temporal modulation energy' feature measures the rate with which each sub-band is modulated. Modulation energy features are computed for 19 referential EEG signals and seven bipolar signals. Salient features are then selected and used to train four different classifiers, namely, support vector machines, logistic regression, classification and regression trees, and neural networks. Experiments with a database of 34 participants, 22 of which have been clinically diagnosed with probable-AD, show a neural network classifier achieving over 91% accuracy, thus significantly outperforming a classifier trained with conventional spectral-based features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".