MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093742640 · doi:10.7901/2169-3358-2001-1-577

Preparedness for Heavy Oil Spills: More Focus on Mechanical Feeder Skimmers

2001· article· en· W2093742640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Oil Spill Conference Proceedings · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeirEnvironmental scienceOil viscosityMarine engineeringOil spillPetroleum engineeringEngineeringWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringViscosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Numerous spills over the years have demonstrated that mechanical response to heavy oil spills at sea is less than successful. Recently, after the 10,000 m3 Erika spill in France, less than 5% was recovered before the oil reached the coast. The weather played an important role, but the selection of equipment and apparent response strategy did as well. Mainly weir skimmers were used. Weir skimmers are, due to their simplicity and reliability, widely used in spills at sea. Probably because some of the well-known brands are equipped with heavy oil transfer pumps, they commonly are used in heavy oil spills. In addition, high capacity units with light oil centrifugal transfer pumps are being used on heavy oil (Erika). Weir skimmers start losing their efficiency when the viscosity of the oil exceeds certain limits. It gets too difficult for the oil to pass the weir lip and flow into the hopper so that the pump can transfer it. For very heavy oils, which barely can float, the inlet weir is an even larger obstruction. A mechanical feeder skimmer lifts or drags the oil out of the water to a position above the water surface and feeds or drops it into a collection tank or a transfer pump. The mechanical feeder principle may result in significantly increased performance regarding high viscosity, debris, and, in most cases, low water content. Recent tests at SAIC/Environment Canada's test facility in Ottawa, Canada, sponsored by the Canadian Coast Guard, demonstrated that floating bitumen with a viscosity of about 2 million cSt could be recovered by mechanical feeder skimmers, while a “high viscosity” weir skimmer had no effect. This puts the Erika's viscosity of “only” 200,000 cSt into perspective, and strongly point at mechanical feeder skimmers in the preparedness for heavy oil spills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it