MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093758446 · doi:10.1115/imece2007-41139

Thermal Drift of Convection-Based Micromachined Accelerometer

2007· article· en· W2093758446 on OpenAlexaff
Andy Wu, John D. Jones

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerometerSensitivity (control systems)ThermalBuoyancyMechanicsComputational fluid dynamicsMaterials scienceConvectionAcousticsComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsElectronic engineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel micromachined accelerometer without proof mass, based on the buoyancy of a heated fluid around a polysilicon heater, has previously been developed and reported. Significant features of this class of accelerometer include low cost and the combination of high sensitivity with high survivability. However, one of its big disadvantages is thermal drift: the sensitivity changes rapidly as the ambient temperature changes. A recent numerical and experimental study has shown that the sensitivity of the convective accelerometer is a function of the Rayleigh number of the working fluid. Using this criterion, a few liquids were selected as potential working fluids to improve the sensitivity of the accelerometer. The CFD program ‘FLOTRAN’ was used to model accelerometer performance using each of these fluids. Based on FLOTRAN modeling, some fluids were selected for experimental investigation. The thermal drift of the accelerometer using different working fluids was documented and the reasons for this thermal drift were discovered. Based on this observation, some possible solutions were proposed to reduce or eliminate the thermal drift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207