ERRATUM: “RADIATIVE EFFICIENCY AND CONTENT OF EXTRAGALACTIC RADIO SOURCES: TOWARD A UNIVERSAL SCALING RELATION BETWEEN JET POWER AND RADIO POWER” (2008, ApJ, 686, 859)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present an analysis of the energetics and particle content of the lobes of 24 radio galaxies at the cores of cooling clusters.The radio lobes in these systems have created visible cavities in the surrounding hot, X-ray-emitting gas, which allow direct measurement of the mechanical jet power of radio sources over six decades of radio luminosity, independently of the radio properties themselves.Using these measurements, we examine the ratio between radio power and total jet power (the radiative efficiency).We find that jet (cavity) power increases with radio synchrotron power approximately as P jet ∼ L β radio , where 0.35 ≤ β ≤ 0.70 depending on the bandpass of measurement and state of the source.However, the scatter about these relations caused by variations in radiative efficiency spans more than four orders of magnitude.A number of factors contribute to this scatter including aging, entrainment, variations in magnetic field strengths, and the partitioning of energy between electrons and non-radiating heavy particles.After accounting for variations in synchrotron break frequency (age), the scatter is reduced by ≈ 50% , yielding the most accurate scaling relation available between the lobe bolometric radio power and the jet (cavity) power.We place limits on the magnetic field strengths and particle content of the radio lobes using a variety of X-ray constraints.We find that the lobe magnetic field strengths vary between a few to several tens of microgauss depending on the age and dynamical state of the lobes.If the cavities are maintained in pressure balance with their surroundings and are supported by internal fields and particles in equipartition, the ratio of energy in electrons to heavy particles (k) must vary widely from approximately unity to 4000, consistent with heavy (hadronic) jets.The synchrotron ages are substantially smaller than the independently measured X-ray buoyancy ages.Low frequency radio observations provide the best tracer of AGN power integrated over the past several hundred million years, and may provide a useful proxy for X-ray cavities in systems where cavities cannot be directly detected but are likely to exist (e.g., in cooling-flow clusters).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".