MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093794525 · doi:10.3166/jds.18.185-201

A Hybrid Approach for Evaluating Environmental Impacts for Urban Transportation Mode Sharing

2009· article· en· W2093794525 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Decision System · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Computer scienceAnalytic hierarchy processVariable (mathematics)Performance indicatorSustainable transportOperations researchTransport engineeringEnvironmental economicsSustainabilityMathematicsBusinessData miningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current paper presents an AHP based approach for evaluating sustainable transport solution measures like car-sharing, park and ride, access control zones etc. In the first stage, we identify the indicators (criteria) for evaluating the transportation solution measure. These indicators (criteria) can be divided into several sub-indicators (sub-criteria). In the second stage, we allot weights to the indicators and sub-indicators using AHP. The values for the sub-indicators are measured using multiple sources and multiplied with their weights in order to compute state change variable values that form part of the city state equation. The respective values of the state change variables in the city state equation are then used to evaluate the efficiency of the transportation solution measure. Finally, we illustrate our approach by giving an example of car-sharing and measuring its impact on city environmental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it