MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093833530 · doi:10.1021/ma8002517

Phase Behavior of Gradient Copolymers

2008· article· en· W2093833530 on OpenAlexaff
Run Jiang, Qinghua Jin, Baohui Li, Datong Ding, Robert A. Wickham, An‐Chang Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerPhase (matter)Lamellar structurePhase diagramMaterials scienceRandom phase approximationLamellar phasePolymer chemistryChemistryPhysicsPolymerComposite materialCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multiblock model is developed for the study of the phase behavior of gradient copolymers. The model is able to describe gradient copolymer chains with arbitrary composition profiles. The validity of the multiblock model of gradient copolymers is established by good agreement between RPA (random phase approximation) results for a continuous composition distribution and a multiblock model. The phase behavior of gradient copolymers is examined using self-consistent mean-field theory (SCMFT) for multiblock copolymers. Phase diagrams of gradient copolymer melts with different gradient profiles are constructed by solving the SCMFT equations. It is discovered that the phase behavior depends sensitively on the gradient profiles. In particular, new triple points are observed, and the stability region of phases with curved interfaces shrinks as the gradient profile becomes smooth. For linear gradient copolymers, the lamellar phase is predicted to be the only stable ordered phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyFrench-language works237,207