Punching of Concrete Slabs due to Column Moment Transfer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unbalanced moments are transferred between columns and flat plates as a result of pattern gravity loading or lateral forces due to wind and earthquakes. Shear stresses produced by moment transfer must be considered in the punching design of column-slab connections as they can be significant, particularly during earthquakes. According to the ACI 318-95 code, a fraction of the unbalanced moment is assumed to be transferred by shear stresses in the slab. The code gives an empirical equation for this fraction; the equation is applicable for the first rectangular shear critical section adjacent to faces of a rectangular interior column. Other equations, for the fraction of moment transferred by shear stresses, which are applicable for shear critical sections of any shape have been developed by earlier researchers based on linear finite-element analyses supplemented by experimental results. These equations are calibrated in the present paper using nonlinear finite-element analyses. 3D finite-elements are employed; thus flexural reinforcing bars running parallel to the slab surface as well as shear reinforcement standing in the direction of the normal to the slab surface can be modeled. The finite-element model is validated, and the analysis results indicate that equations developed by earlier researchers, for the fraction of moment transferred by slab shear stresses, are adequate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it