MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093934484 · doi:10.1051/forest:2003057

Performance and physiology of large containerized and bare-root spruce seedlings in relation to scarification and competition in Qu�bec (Canada)

2003· article· en· W2093934484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Forest Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSeedling growth and survival studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScarificationCompetition (biology)ForestryBotanyBiologyRoot (linguistics)Douglas firEcologyGeographyGermination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Québec (Canada), the use of large planting stock is being applied in combination with scarification, since herbicide use is forbidden in public forest.Large containerized and bare-root stock of black spruce were planted on two sites located within the sub-boreal mixedwood region of eastern Québec.We analyzed data to detect main effects and interactions among scarification, competing vegetation and stock type on seedling growth and physiology during the first three growing seasons.Scarification did not improve seedling water relations, third-year height and ground-level diameter, and foliar nutrient concentration.After three years, the two stock types showed similar water relations and nutritional status but the large containerized seedlings performed slightly better than the large bare-root stock in terms of diameter and height growth.Competing vegetation greatly reduced seedling diameter, foliar-N concentration, compared to competition-free seedlings.We discuss results in relation with treatment effects on above-and belowground resource availability to newly planted conifers.scarification / competing vegetation / large seedling / growth / xylem water potential Résumé -Performance et physiologie de plants de fortes dimensions d'épinette produits en récipients et à racines nues en relation avec le scarifiage et la végétation compétitive au Québec (Canada).Au Québec (Canada), l'utilisation de phytocides chimiques est proscrite en forêt publique.Le reboisement de plants de fortes dimensions (PFD) est pratiqué, en combinaison avec le scarifiage, sur les stations à haut risque de compétition.Des PFD d'épinette noire en récipients (RC) et à racines nues (RN) ont été plantés sur deux sites afin d'évaluer les effets du scarifiage, de la compétition, du type de plant et de leurs interactions sur l'établissement des plants pendant les trois premières saisons de croissance.Le scarifiage n'a pas d'effet marqué sur les dimensions et la physiologie des semis après trois ans.Les deux types de PFD présentent, après trois saisons, des relations hydriques et des statuts nutritifs équivalents.Les RC atteignent des dimensions légèrement supérieures à celles des RN.La végétation a peu d'impacts sur la croissance en hauteur, mais affecte négativement le diamètre et le statut nutritif.Nous discutons des résultats à l'égard de leurs effets sur la disponibilité des ressources environnementales pour les plants.scarifiage / végétation compétitive / plant de fortes dimensions / croissance / potentiel hydrique du xylème

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it