Le mouvement des caisses populaires acadiennes et sa contribution à la vitalité de la communauté acadienne et francophone du Nouveau-Brunswick1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Mouvement des caisses populaires acadiennes aura 75 ans en 2011. L’historique présente l’évolution qui l’a amené à près de 200 000 membres, à l’accumulation d’actifs de 2,5 milliards $ et à la mise en place d’une structure organisationnelle en appui aux services offerts par ses Caisses. La notion de vitalité, toujours en développement, aide les communautés en milieu minoritaire à améliorer leurs compréhensions de ce qui leur permettrait de se maintenir, voire de s’épanouir de façon distincte et active. L’analyse de la contribution d’une institution à la vitalité est une approche encore peu utilisée dans les écrits. Les résultats de l’analyse font valoir que par ses résultats, ses acquis, ses valeurs coopératives et son implication socio-économique, le Mouvement contribue à la vitalité de la communauté francophone et acadienne du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".