Espace urbain et religion : esquisse d’une géographie des lieux de culte minoritaires de la région de Montréal.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article esquisse une géographie des lieux de culte dits minoritaires (c'est-à-dire non catholiques romains ou protestants) de la région montréalaise et examine quelques éléments des stratégies spatiales déployées par différents groupes religieux dans la localisation de leurs lieux de culte. Dans un deuxième temps, nous nous intéressons au contexte réglementaire qui encadre l'aménagement des lieux de culte à l'échelle municipale. En nous inspirant de l'étude récente de quelques cas d'aménagement de lieux de culte au sein des communautés juives hassidiques et musulmanes montréalaises, nous concluons en présentant les principaux enjeux - fiscaux, économiques, politiques et sociaux - de cohabitation qui sous-tendent les aménagements cultuels dans l'espace urbain montréalais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".