MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093990675 · doi:10.1159/000048929

Age-Related Bone Loss: Old Bone, New Facts

2002· review· en· W2093990675 on OpenAlexaff
George Chan, Gustavo Duque

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBone Metabolism and Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityVictoria HospitalRoyal Victoria HospitalRoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone remodeling periodOsteoclastBone remodelingBone resorptionOsteoblastBone marrowOsteoporosisBone cellEndocrinologyInternal medicineHormoneBiologyMedicineCell biologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human skeleton serves several functions for the body: support, locomotion, protection of vital organs, and housing of bone marrow. Bone remodeling is the result of the interactions of multiple elements, including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, hormones, growth factors, and cytokines, the end result being the maintenance of the bone architecture and to maintain systemic calcium homeostasis. In early life, a careful balance exists between bone formation by osteoblasts and bone resorption by osteoclasts. With aging, the process of coupled bone formation is affected by the reduction of osteoblast differentiation, activity, and life span which is further potentiated in the perimenopausal years with hormone deprivation and increased osteoclast activity. Age-related bone loss is thus not only a consequence of hormone deprivation, but also the result of changes in bone formation and cell-cell interactions with a unique pathophysiology. In this review, we describe the cellular and metabolic changes associated with aging bone and present recent evidence regarding cell differentiation within the bone marrow. We also consider the mechanism of programmed cell death, apoptosis, as being an important determinant of aging in bone as well as describe possible future interventions to prolong the life span of osteoblasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations260
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGerontologySame topicBone Metabolism and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207