MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094018665 · doi:10.1117/12.505916

Thermal holographic gratings in liquid crystal cell for dynamic beam control in 1500 nm range

2003· article· en· W2094018665 on OpenAlex
Alexander S. Kuzhelev, Alexander E. Dudelzak, Michael Maszkiewicz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsMaterials scienceGratingHolographyOpticsDiffraction efficiencyAbsorption (acoustics)OptoelectronicsLiquid crystalDiffraction gratingBeam (structure)ThermalLaserCrystal (programming language)DiffractionWavelengthPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of thermally induced holographic gratings written in NLC by the laser beams at telecommunication wavelength of 1500 nm is presented. Thermally induced gratings are especially interesting as having at least one order of magnitude faster response time than orientational gratings. However, their formation in the range 1300-1600 nm is limited due to small absorption of NLCs and absence of effective doping. The formation of thermal grating in our cell is initiated by absorption in the cell walls coating. The tuning of liquid crystal temperature and orientational enhancement of thermal grating allowed us to reach 3% level of diffraction efficiency at low writing beams intensity (23 Wcm<sup>-2</sup>) and small thickness of material (0.02 mm). Holographic liquid crystal devices can be used in all-optical switching, beam routing, automatic wave front correction, phase conjugation etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it