MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094040396 · doi:10.1145/2046556.2046573

Privacy-preserving traffic padding in web-based applications

2011· article· en· W2094040396 on OpenAlex
Wen Ming Liu, Lingyu Wang, Pengsu Cheng, Mourad Debbabi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPaddingComputer scienceData publishingComputer securityEncryptionPopularityNetwork packetInformation privacyWeb trafficThe InternetComputer networkWorld Wide WebPublishing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While web-based applications are gaining popularity, they also pose new security challenges. In particular, Chen et al. recently revealed that many popular Web applications actually leak out highly sensitive data from encrypted traffic due to side-channel attacks using packet sizes and timing [1]. They further demonstrated that existing solutions usually incur a high overhead while still not guaranteeing privacy protection. In this paper, we observe a striking similarity between this issue and another well studied problem, privacy-preserving data publishing (PPDP). Based on such a similarity, we propose a formal model for privacy-preserving traffic padding (PPTP) that encompasses privacy requirement, padding cost, and padding methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it