MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094054655 · doi:10.1063/1.1320042

Magnetoimpedance measurements of ferromagnetic resonance and antiresonance

2000· article· en· W2094054655 on OpenAlex
Mohammed Réda Britel, David Ménard, L. G. C. Melo, P. Ciureanu, A. Yelon, R. W. Cochrane, M. Rouabhi, B. Cornut

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiresonanceFerromagnetic resonanceCondensed matter physicsMagnetizationMagnetometerFerromagnetismResonance (particle physics)Materials scienceSaturation (graph theory)Magnetic fieldAmorphous solidNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryPhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the observation of both ferromagnetic resonance and antiresonance in a magnetic metal using a magnetoimpedance technique. In this experiment, the magnetoimpedance was measured as the frequency was swept from 30 MHz to 11 GHz at constant magnetic fields ranging up to 1.1 kOe (88 kA/m). The sample was an amorphous NiCo-rich soft-magnetic wire with a saturation magnetization sufficiently small to meet both the resonance and antiresonance conditions at frequencies below 10 GHz. A saturation magnetization, very close to that obtained through magnetometry, was deduced using a simultaneous fit to the field dependence of the resonance and antiresonance frequencies. This experiment clearly demonstrates that magnetoimpedance provides a powerful tool for characterizing the intrinsic properties of magnetic metals, with several advantages compared to standard ferromagnetic resonance techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it