MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094086305 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0254

The World in Paint: Modern Art and Visuality in England, 1848-1914 (review)

2007· article· en· W2094086305 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alison Syme

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernism (music)PaintingAestheticismModernityArt historyArtExhibitionContext (archaeology)PortraitModern artHistoryPerformance artPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The World in Paint: Modern Art and Visuality in England, 1848–1914 Alison Syme (bio) David Peters Corbett. The World in Paint: Modern Art and Visuality in England, 1848–1914 Penn State University Press. xviii, 318. US $75.00, US $35.00 The World in Paint is an ambitious study that takes the standard formalist account of modernism to task for its geographical prejudices, and social history for its dismissal of purely visual concerns. Like Jonathan Crary's Techniques of the Observer, David Peters Corbett's book dates the origins of modern visuality prior to the emergence of Manet and the Impressionists and, in the English context, prior to the 'Manet and the Post-Impressionists' exhibition organized by Roger Fry in 1910. Identifying a 'new climate of possibility for the visual' in the 1840s in England, Corbett proposes a rethinking not only of the development of English modernism, but of modernism and the registration of modernity in painting more broadly. The book is divided into chapters on the Pre-Raphaelites, Aestheticism, the relationship of Oscar Wilde and his illustrator Charles Ricketts, Walter Sickert, and Vorticism. In each case study Corbett analyses how his artist-protagonists tried to negotiate the difficult questions of whether and how pigment could or should register modern experience. His discussion of Wilde's Portrait of Dorian Gray, for example, highlights the story's mockery of painting's truth-claims through its literalization of 'what it would really mean to impress experience directly onto the surface of a canvas.' Corbett explores a wealth of different painterly responses to these vexing questions, including scepticism about, repudiation of, or belief in 'the visual's access to the real.' In each instance, artists' concerns with pigment's potential for embodying, mediating, or disclaiming reality and modernity are examined in light of wider ongoing debates, such as the commodification of art, the experience of the modern city, and the different representational capacities of word and image. The larger problem the book addresses is 'how to connect historical circumstance with the physical surfaces of paintings.' Corbett's analyses of the ways pigment and facture were understood in each period he discusses are thoroughly researched and draw convincingly on a broad range of published and unpublished sources. His textual citations give a compelling sense of how paint, in all its materiality, was culturally perceived. Corbett, however, rarely treats the surfaces of specific paintings in much detail. The book, then, doesn't entirely fulfil its promise of returning to the visual. The exception to this is the chapter on Walter Sickert. Corbett's detailed treatment of Sickert's music-hall scenes, particularly Gatti's Hungerford Palace of Varieties: Second Turn of Katie Lawrence, is stunning in its visual sensitivity and eloquent unfolding of the complexities of layers of fiction and reality, reference and self-reference in the work. Sickert's 'nuanced investigation into paint's adequacy as a vehicle' for describing modern [End Page 442] experience is also compellingly, if not as thoroughly, explored through the haunting Camden Town Murder paintings. The World in Paint is a welcome contribution to the history of English art, its complex weaving together of diverse agendas refreshing and admirable. If Corbett doesn't always provide as much formal analysis as one would like, he offers a rigorously historicized framework from which to begin. Alison Syme Alison Syme, Department of Fine Art, University of Toronto at Mississauga Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207