The World in Paint: Modern Art and Visuality in England, 1848-1914 (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: The World in Paint: Modern Art and Visuality in England, 1848–1914 Alison Syme (bio) David Peters Corbett. The World in Paint: Modern Art and Visuality in England, 1848–1914 Penn State University Press. xviii, 318. US $75.00, US $35.00 The World in Paint is an ambitious study that takes the standard formalist account of modernism to task for its geographical prejudices, and social history for its dismissal of purely visual concerns. Like Jonathan Crary's Techniques of the Observer, David Peters Corbett's book dates the origins of modern visuality prior to the emergence of Manet and the Impressionists and, in the English context, prior to the 'Manet and the Post-Impressionists' exhibition organized by Roger Fry in 1910. Identifying a 'new climate of possibility for the visual' in the 1840s in England, Corbett proposes a rethinking not only of the development of English modernism, but of modernism and the registration of modernity in painting more broadly. The book is divided into chapters on the Pre-Raphaelites, Aestheticism, the relationship of Oscar Wilde and his illustrator Charles Ricketts, Walter Sickert, and Vorticism. In each case study Corbett analyses how his artist-protagonists tried to negotiate the difficult questions of whether and how pigment could or should register modern experience. His discussion of Wilde's Portrait of Dorian Gray, for example, highlights the story's mockery of painting's truth-claims through its literalization of 'what it would really mean to impress experience directly onto the surface of a canvas.' Corbett explores a wealth of different painterly responses to these vexing questions, including scepticism about, repudiation of, or belief in 'the visual's access to the real.' In each instance, artists' concerns with pigment's potential for embodying, mediating, or disclaiming reality and modernity are examined in light of wider ongoing debates, such as the commodification of art, the experience of the modern city, and the different representational capacities of word and image. The larger problem the book addresses is 'how to connect historical circumstance with the physical surfaces of paintings.' Corbett's analyses of the ways pigment and facture were understood in each period he discusses are thoroughly researched and draw convincingly on a broad range of published and unpublished sources. His textual citations give a compelling sense of how paint, in all its materiality, was culturally perceived. Corbett, however, rarely treats the surfaces of specific paintings in much detail. The book, then, doesn't entirely fulfil its promise of returning to the visual. The exception to this is the chapter on Walter Sickert. Corbett's detailed treatment of Sickert's music-hall scenes, particularly Gatti's Hungerford Palace of Varieties: Second Turn of Katie Lawrence, is stunning in its visual sensitivity and eloquent unfolding of the complexities of layers of fiction and reality, reference and self-reference in the work. Sickert's 'nuanced investigation into paint's adequacy as a vehicle' for describing modern [End Page 442] experience is also compellingly, if not as thoroughly, explored through the haunting Camden Town Murder paintings. The World in Paint is a welcome contribution to the history of English art, its complex weaving together of diverse agendas refreshing and admirable. If Corbett doesn't always provide as much formal analysis as one would like, he offers a rigorously historicized framework from which to begin. Alison Syme Alison Syme, Department of Fine Art, University of Toronto at Mississauga Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".