MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094094398 · doi:10.2118/77918-ms

Buffalo Redevelopment "The Wee Field That Grew"

2002· article· en· W2094094398 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Begg, Russell S. Krasey, Doug A Lehto

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnticlineGeologyInfillDrillingAtticFault (geology)Structural basinSeismologyMining engineeringEngineeringPaleontologyCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract During 2001 an intensive geophysical, geological and reservoir engineering, analysis was carried out on Nexen's 100% WI Buffalo Project located in the Bonaparte Basin. The work resulted in the successful drilling of two infill wells, during March / June 2002. The value, reserves and economic life of the Buffalo Project has been extended by 2 years with additional recovery of approximately 8 MMbbl. This paper will review the original geologic / geophysical model and the non-unique nature of the Reservoir Engineering history match. The pre-stack depth migration [PSDM] work and results will then be described in detail, along with an explanation of the revised geologic model for Buffalo and how it changed our concept of the upside in the field. The reservoir simulation, decision tree, production forecasts and reserve summary will then be described. The PSDM work indicated that the field is a tilted fault block, analogous to other fields in the Bonaparte Basin, instead of a rollover anticline. In the rollover anticline model, both original producers, Buffalo 3 and Buffalo 5, were located along the central crest of the anticline. The new tilted fault block model indicated both a "Northern Attic" and a "Western Attic". The infill drilling program was designed to drain the yet unswept attic oil at Buffalo. Since Buffalo has a very strong water drive, typical reservoir simulation would not "see" the presence of the attics in the field, and the simulation results are not unique. Nexen had developed a comprehensive decision matrix, which reduced risk and created maximum flexibility. The Buffalo 7 well was critical to proving the new geologic model of the field. The well was drilled and completed in March-April 2002 and was followed Buffalo 8, Completed as Buffalo 9, in May-June 2002. Nexen used a multi disciplinary team to review Buffalo, which has resulted in a successful project. Nexen has applied its expertise gained in Western Canada, the Gulf of Mexico and Yemen to its operations in Australia. The successful redevelopment of Buffalo has increased reserves, extended productive life and increased the value of Buffalo to Nexen. The work has enhanced the companie's reputation in Australia as an operator with experience in both exploration and exploitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and ExhibitionSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207