MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Meteoritical Bulletin, No. 98, September 2010

2010· article· en· W2094105258 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. K. Weisberg, C. L. Smith, C. D. K. Herd, H. Haack, Akira Yamaguchi, H. Chennaoui Aoudjehane, L. C. Welzenbach, J. N. Grossman

Bibliographic record

VenueMeteoritics and Planetary Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract– This issue of The Meteoritical Bulletin reports information on 1103 meteorites including 281 non‐Antarctic meteorites ( Table 1 ) and 822 Antarctic meteorites ( Table 2 ). Reported in full written descriptions are three falls. Full descriptions are also given for three shergottites, two ungrouped irons, a primitive achondrite, an olivine diogenite, and a lunar meteorite. One iron, Gebel Kamil, was found in and around the Kamil impact crater. Also reported is a new dense collection area in Tunisia. Tables list a wide variety of meteorites including chondrites, ureilites, irons, acapulcoites, and HEDs. Antarctic meteorites reported in this edition include meteorites recovered by ANSMET (US), CHINARE (China), KOREAMET (Korea), and the NIPR (Japan) meteorite recovery programs. List of newly approved, non‐Antarctic meteorties by country. Name Location Date of recovery or purchase(p) Latitude Longitude Mass (g) Pieces Class Sha WGb Fa mol % Fs mol % Wo mol % Mag sus log109 m3 kg−1) Classifier(s)c Type specimen mass (g) Type specimen location Main massd Comment Meteorites from Argentina Cruz del Eje Cordoba 18‐May‐1971 30°45′S 64°47′W 14kg 1 Iron, IAB complex A. Ruzicka, M. Hutson, Cascadia; S. Kissin, LHU 21.4 Cascadia Anon Meteorites from Canada Redwater Alberta 30‐Aug‐2009 53°55.974′N 112°58.620′W 230 2 H4 S2 W5 19.2 ± 1.3 16.2 ± 1.5 1.3 ± 0.3 C. Herd, UAb 40.5 UAb B. Newman Meteorites from Ecuador Daule Guayas 23‐Mar‐2008 1°52′15.2″S 79°57′27.2″W 6580 1 L5 S4 W0 24.5 ± 0.5 20.8 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.2 J. Grossman, USGS 20.37 SI Farmer See written description Meteorites from Egypt Gebel Kamil Al Wadi al Jadid, East Uweinat Desert 19‐Feb‐2009 22°01′06″N 26°05′16″E 1600 kg 1000s Iron, ungrouped M. D’Orazio, Luigi Folco 1500 MNA‐SI EGM See written description GSS 030 Al Wadi al Jadid 26‐Dec‐2006 26°22.69′N 26°51.03′E 51.3 1 H6 S2 W3/4 18.5 ± 0.2 16.4 ± 0.2 4.71 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot‐Denise, MNHNP 12.2 MNHNP L. Ferrière GSS 031 Al Wadi al Jadid 30‐Dec‐2006 25°26.17′N 25°29.19′E 62.3 1 H5 S3/4 W2 18.6 ± 0.2 16.6 ± 1.0 5.06 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot 14 MNHNP L. Ferrière GSS 032 Al Wadi al Jadid 31‐Dec‐2006 26°11.20′N 25°27.34′E 8.3 1 Acapulcoite W4 7.5 ± 0.2 8.2 ± 0.2 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot 6.7 MNHNP L. Ferrière Ca‐pyx Fs3.6Wo43.5; grain sizes ∼100–300; rare relic chondrules GSS 033 Al Wadi al Jadid 31‐Dec‐2006 26°11.20′N 25°27.34′E 80.1 1 L5 S3/4 W2 24.8 ± 0.4 21.2 ± 0.9 4.34 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot 18.7 MNHNP L. Ferrière GSS 034 Al Wadi al Jadid 31‐Dec‐2006 26°11.20′N 25°27.34′E 7.72 1 L5/6 S5/6 W2 24.4 ± 0.6 20.6 ± 1.0 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot 6.2 MNHNP L. Ferrière GSS 035 Al Wadi al Jadid 2‐Jan‐2007 26°37.00′N 26°11.96′E 40.9 1 H5/6 S3/4 W3/4 19.0 ± 0.1 16.3 ± 0.2 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot 8.9 MNHNP L. Ferrière GSS 036 Al Wadi al Jadid 2‐Jan‐2007 26°37.52′N 26°11.90′E 129 1 H5 S2/3 W4/5 19.1 ± 0.2 16.7 ± 0.4 4.56 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot 21.8 MNHNP L. Ferrière GSS 037 Al Wadi al Jadid 2‐Jan‐2007 26°46.28′N 26°32.57′E 66.9 6 H4 S2/3 W3/4 18.6 ± 0.2 16.4 ± 0.2 4.69 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot 15.3 MNHNP L. Ferrière GSS 038 Al Wadi al Jadid 3‐Jan‐2007 26°49.55′N 27°08.54′E 146 1 H5 S4/5 W2 18.8 ± 0.7 17.1 ± 0.6 4.85 L. Ferrière & M. Bourot 24.5

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2020.205

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeteoritics and Planetary ScienceSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207